Lithium 9-phenyl-9-borataanthracene ( 3 ·Li(THF) x, x = 2 or 3) is obtained quantitatively from the deprotonation of 9-phenyl-9,10-dihydro-9-borataanthracene ( 6 ) with LiTMP (TMP = 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide) in THF. A comparison of the crystallographically determined structures of 6 and 3 ·Li(TMEDA) (TMEDA = N, N, N ‘, N ‘-tetramethylethylenediamine) highlights the effects of charge and delocalization on the heterocyclic framework. The reaction of 3 ·Li(THF) 2 with Cp*ZrCl 3 (Cp* = C 5 Me 5 ) and Cp*ZrMe 2 Cl affords the novel complexes (AnB-Ph)Cp*ZrCl 2 ( 4 ) (AnB-Ph = 9-phenyl-9-borataanthracene) and (AnB-Ph)Cp*ZrMe 2 ( 5 ), respectively. The crystallographically determined molecular structure of 4 resembles a bent metallocene with a tetrahedral disposition of ligands around zirconium. The borataanthracene ligand bends significantly (approx 16°) to avoid steric contacts with the Cp*ZrCl 2 core. The angle of the exocyclic phenyl substituent relative to the anthracene unit remains nearly invariant at 62° for 6, 3 ·Li(TMEDA), and 4, suggesting that the steric envelope around boron prevents an optimum orientation for orbital overlap between boron and the π-system of the phenyl ring. Treatment of 5 with B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 gives [(AnB-Ph)Cp*ZrMe][MeB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] ( 7 ). Reaction of 4 with methylaluminoxane (MAO) and 1 atm of ethylene produces a mixture of low molecular weight 1-alkenes, 2-alkenes, and 2-alkyl-1-alkenes, whereas the reaction of 7 with ethylene gives low molecular weight polyethylene. Reactions of 4 /MAO and 7 with 1-tridecene were carried out to determine the fate of 1-alkenes generated using 4 /MAO/C 2 H 4 and to delineate the role of the activator. The complex (C 5 H 5 B-Ph)Cp*ZrCl 2 ( 8 ) is obtained by reaction of Cp*ZrCl 3 with Li[C 5 H 5 B-Ph]. A comparison of the reactivity of 8 /MAO/C 2 H 4 against that of 4 /MAO/C 2 H 4 highlights, for the first time, the effect of sterics on the stability of catalysts supported by boratacyclic ligands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: