Key result
Angiotensin system inhibitor use was not associated with any differences in overall survival or disease-free survival compared to non-use in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Why the study?
Angiotensin system inhibitors improve prognosis in gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers, but their impact on overall and disease-free survival in esophageal cancer patients remained unknown.
Does angiotensin system inhibitor use improve overall survival and disease-free survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer?
Cohort (n=123)
No
Does angiotensin system inhibitor use improve overall survival and disease-free survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer?
Angiotensin system inhibitor use does not appear to improve overall or disease-free survival in patients undergoing curative intent surgery for esophageal cancer.
Should not change perioperative management in esophageal cancer; leaves open whether randomized trials would detect a survival signal.
Angiotensin system inhibitors are associated with improved prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers. Data suggest that renin–angiotensin system signaling stimulates the tumor's immune microenvironment to impact overall survival. The goal of this study is to investigate the role of angiotensin system inhibitor use on the overall survival and disease-free survival of esophageal cancer patients. Retrospective review of esophagectomy patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancer at a single institution tertiary care center from 2007 to 2018 was performed. Outcomes include overall survival and disease-free survival. Patient characteristics were compared with t test and χ2 test. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional-hazards regression. One hundred seventy-one patients were identified and 123 underwent esophagectomy for cancer. No significant differences in patient demographics were found between angiotensin system inhibitor users and non–angiotensin system inhibitor users except for the rates of hypertension (40% vs 94%, P < .01) and diabetes (16% vs 47%, P < .01). Distributions of tumor neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, pathology, staging, margins, and surgical approach were similar. Postoperatively, there was no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events or infection rates. This study did not find any differences in overall survival and disease-free survival between angiotensin system inhibitor users and non–angiotensin system inhibitor users. Angiotensin system inhibitors have been shown to improve survival and decrease relative risk for several types of cancers; however, our data do not support the same effect on esophageal cancer patients undergoing curative intent surgery. Further research is needed to investigate potential nuances in angiotensin system inhibitor dose, chronicity of use, esophageal pathology, and applicability to nonsurgical candidates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Esophageal cancer (n=123). Angiotensin system inhibitors vs. Non-angiotensin system inhibitor users was evaluated on Overall survival and disease-free survival. Angiotensin system inhibitor use was not associated with any differences in overall survival or disease-free survival compared to non-use in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: