Key result
Electronic medical records assessment of beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction demonstrated a sensitivity of 83-100% compared with manual chart review.
Why the study?
Does computer-driven assessment of electronic medical records match the accuracy of manual chart review for assessing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction in older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,490)
No
Does computer-driven assessment of electronic medical records match the accuracy of manual chart review for assessing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction in older adults?
Electronic medical records can accurately replace manual chart review for measuring beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction, enabling automated performance measurement.
May enable automated post-MI beta-blocker assessment; leaves open broader validation across medications and systems.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Weiner (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in Myocardial infarction (n=4,490). Electronic medical records assessment vs. Manual chart review was evaluated on Sensitivity of electronic review compared with manual chart review for assessing beta-blocker use. Electronic medical records assessment of beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction demonstrated a sensitivity of 83-100% compared with manual chart review.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: