Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dicey is not fashionable these days, and for understandable reasons. The cocktail of utilitarianism and positivism, the amalgam of Bentham and Austin, that he produced led inexorably to the proclamation of unlimited parliamentary supremacy. This is widely, though with much exaggeration, conceived to be the major prop of authoritarian government. It is also, more correctly, seen as hostile to the idea of human rights possessed by persons against governments. In one sense, the decision to incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights into UK domestic law is an authoritative repudiation of the Diceyian heritage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leigh et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: