Key result
Neck circumference was significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.06-1.56), with a stronger association observed in Western populations.
Why the study?
Neck circumference has been suggested as a predictor for blood pressure disorders, prompting a systematic evaluation of its association with blood pressure in adults.
Is neck circumference associated with elevated blood pressure and risk of hypertension in adults?
Meta-Analysis
Is neck circumference associated with elevated blood pressure and risk of hypertension in adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.29 (95% CI 1.06–1.56)
Neck circumference is a useful anthropometric measurement that correlates with elevated blood pressure and increased risk of hypertension, particularly in Western populations.
May support neck circumference in hypertension risk assessment for Western adults; extends observational meta-analyses but leaves prospective validation open.
Neck circumference (NC) has been suggested as a predictor for blood pressure disorders. Therefore, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the association between NC and blood pressure in adults. Pertinent studies were identified by searching PubMed and Scopus databases, up to March 2018. Studies which reported the correlation coefficient between NC, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were selected. Also, studies reported the odds ratio (OR) of hypertension or pre-hypertension included adults older than 18 years old were selected. Results were pooled using a random-effects model. Of 29 studies included in meta-analysis, 26 studies reported only correlation coefficient, 3 studies reported only odds ratio and 2 studies reported both correlation coefficient and odds ratio. Overall, NC was significantly correlated with SBP [ES (z)=0.20; 95% CI=0.18, 0.23] and DBP [ES (z)=0.20; 95% CI=0.16, 0.24]. Type of correlation coefficient was the sources of observed heterogeneity. Also, NC was directly associated with the risk of hypertension (OR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.06-1.56), but not pre-hypertension (OR=1.18; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.52). Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on the region indicated that the studies conducted in Western regions reported higher risk of HTN in association with NC (OR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.23-1.32), but not among those conducted in the Eastern regions (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 0.96-1.28). NC seems to be a new anthropometric measurement, which is probably a good predictor of elevated blood pressure, especially in the Western population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moradi et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension. Neck circumference was evaluated on Hypertension (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.56). Neck circumference was significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.06-1.56), with a stronger association observed in Western populations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: