Key result
A 77-year-old woman presenting with acute chest pain and EKG changes mimicking acute coronary syndrome was found to have a pacemaker lead perforation causing hemorrhagic pericardial effusion.
Case Report (n=1)
Pacemaker lead perforation should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain and EKG changes in patients with recent pacemaker implantation to avoid delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
Consider lead perforation in post-implant patients with ACS-like presentation; single case leaves open incidence and screening needs.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing pacemaker lead perforation in the setting of chest pain and EKG changes is difficult and usually not considered unless we have awareness and high index of suspicion. This kind of clinical scenario represents one of the diagnostic challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77 year-old Caucasian female came to emergency room with left sided non-exertional chest pain radiating to her back for the past two days. A week prior to this presentation, she had a stent supported angioplasty for in-stent re-stenosis and subsequently dual chamber pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome. On physical exam she is very obese, had normal vital signs, peripheral pulses and cardio-respiratory exam. Electrocardiogram revealed new T- wave inversions in inferior and anterior leads. Initial chest X-ray, 2D-Echocardiogram and cardiac enzymes were normal. Acute coronary syndrome was considered as an initial probable diagnosis. She was anticoagulated with heparin and eptifibatide. Patient continued to have chest pain with negative cardiac biomarkers. She developed hypotension, oliguria, elevated white count, pyuria and renal failure. Because of a normal 2D-echocardiogram, cardiac etiology for shock was not suspected. After initial fluid challenge, empiric treatment for septic shock was initiated with antibiotics and vasopressors. Work up for pulmonary embolism and intra-abdominal hemorrhage was negative. Because of persistent chest pain, shock with cold & clammy extremities and elevated central venous pressure cardiogenic shock was considered and a repeat 2D-echocardiogram was done on third day of hospitalization which revealed pericardial effusion. Non-contrast CT-scan chest done to look for lead position confirmed that she had hemorrhagic pericardial effusion along with lead perforation. Patient underwent pericardial window placement along with over-sewing of atrial wall to seal the leakage point. The patient improved and was then discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSION: Lead perforation presenting with chest pain and EKG changes is often not appreciated resulting in significant delay in diagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peddi et al. (2010) conducted a case report in Pacemaker lead perforation (n=1). Pacemaker lead perforation was evaluated. A 77-year-old woman presenting with acute chest pain and EKG changes mimicking acute coronary syndrome was found to have a pacemaker lead perforation causing hemorrhagic pericardial effusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: