Key result
The presence of a left atrial septal pouch was significantly more prevalent in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (21.6%) compared to those with strokes of known origin (14.7%).
Why the study?
Some embolic events might be caused by a left atrial septal pouch due to potential thrombus formation, but whether it is a risk factor for ESUS remained unclear.
Is the presence of a left atrial septal pouch associated with an increased risk of embolic stroke of undetermined source in patients with ischemic stroke?
Observational (n=1,126)
Blinded review of TEEs
No
Is the presence of a left atrial septal pouch associated with an increased risk of embolic stroke of undetermined source in patients with ischemic stroke?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.6% vs 14.7%
p-value: p=0.019
Left atrial septal pouch is independently associated with embolic stroke of undetermined source, suggesting it may be an under-recognized cardioembolic source.
Background and objectives Cryptogenic strokes can be defined by the criteria established for an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Some embolic events might be caused by a left atrial septal pouch (LASP), due to the potential of thrombus formation. In this study we aimed to determine if LASP is a risk factor for ESUS when compared to a population of strokes of known origin, the LASP screening rate in our institution and if LASP dimensions influences the risk of ESUS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed transesophageal echocardiograms (TEEs) in a large cohort of patients that had experienced ischemic strokes. Two authors performed blinded, independent searches for LASPs by reviewing 1152 TEEs from patients that had experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack. We excluded 26 TEEs, due to incorrect imaging. Next, we reviewed patient medical files. Results Among the 1126 included patients, 148 had an ESUS (ESUS+ group) and 978 had strokes of known origin (ESUS– group). A LASP was present in 176 patients, including 32 patients (21.6% of LASPs) in the ESUS+ group and 144 patients (14.7% of LASPs) in the ESUS– group. In multivariate analysis, LASP was independently associated with ESUS (P = 0,019). 61.9% of LASPs that we found were not mentioned in reports from the original TEE operators. Conclusion This study demonstrated that LASPs were more prevalent in patients with ESUS than in patients with strokes of known origin. Our results gave rise to the question of whether anticoagulation would be appropriate for some patients with ESUS. New large-scale, prospective studies should be conducted to address this issue. Additionally, considering the low rate of LASP descriptions, we concluded that the awareness of operators should be raised to improve their success in identifying LASPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steyaert et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke (n=1,126). Left atrial septal pouch (LASP) vs. Strokes of known origin (ESUS-) was evaluated on Prevalence of left atrial septal pouch (LASP) (p=0.019). The presence of a left atrial septal pouch was significantly more prevalent in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (21.6%) compared to those with strokes of known origin (14.7%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: