Key result
Concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR did not significantly affect 1-year mortality compared to none/mild TR (9.1 vs 7.9 deaths per 100-person years; P=0.815).
Why the study?
The outcome of patients undergoing TAVR can be affected by coexisting tricuspid regurgitation, prompting investigation into clinical results based on the presence of significant TR.
Does concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation worsen 1-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=345)
Does concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation worsen 1-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR?
Hazard Ratio: 0.87 (95% CI 0.26–2.89)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 7.9%
p-value: p=0.815
Concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation does not appear to significantly worsen 30-day or 1-year mortality and re-hospitalization rates in patients undergoing TAVR.
Significant TR was not associated with higher 1-year mortality after TAVR; leaves open whether TR severity should guide candidacy or require intervention.
Background: The outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can be affected by coexisting tricuspid regurgitation (TR). The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical results of patients undergoing TAVR with or without concomitant significant TR. Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR were divided into two groups according to TR severity: none/mild TR (low-grade) and moderate/severe TR (significant). Data were analysed and compared. Primary endpoint was the mortality 1-year. Secondary endpoints were re-hospitalization and the degree of postoperative and 1-year TR. Results: TAVR procedures were performed in 345 patients between September 2011 and February 2020. Median STS score was 4.3% (IQR: 2.6–7.2), median LVEF was 59.0% (IQR: 45.0–62.0), median aortic area was 0.70cm2 (IQR: 0.60–0.86), median mean gradient was 43.0mmHg (IQR: 36.0–53.0). Before TAVR, 297 patients (86.1%) had low-grade TR and 48 (13.9%) significant TR. Mean age was 82.4 ± 5.7 and 83.8 ± 6.2 years in low-grade and significant TR group, respectively (p = 0.109), with 47.5% (low-grade TR) and 56.3% (significant TR) of female patients (p = 0.279). Patients showed differences in EuroSCORE-II (3.2% (IQR: 1.9–5.7) in low-grade TR vs. 5.6% (IQR: 3.7–8.1) in significant TR; p < 0.001), impaired right ventricular function (3.0% vs. 20.8%; p < 0.001) and pulmonary hypertension (9.1% vs. 39.6%; p < 0.001). Mean valve size was 27.7 ± 2.9 mm. Hospital mortality was 2.0% in low-grade TR and 4.2% in significantTR patients (p = 0.308). Among discharged patients (n = 337), seven patients died within 30 days (2.0% low-grade TR; 2.1% significant TR; logrank test p = 0.154) and 40 were re-hospitalized for heart failure (11.1% low-grade TR; 14.6% significant TR; p = 0.470). After one year, 26 patients died, corresponding to a mortality of 7.9 deaths per 100-person year (95% CI 5.2–12.0) in low-grade TR group and 9.1 deaths per 100-person year (95% CI 3.4–24.3) in significant TR group (logrank test p = 0.815), with HR (low grade vs. significant TR) of 0.87, 95% CI 0.26–2.89. Re-hospitalization for heart failure was 16.5% and 19.6% for low-grade and significant TR, respectively (p = 0.713). Echocardiographic and functional changes over time showed no significant interaction between TR and time. Conclusions: In our experience, patients undergoing TAVR showed similar 30-day and 1-year outcome and re-hospitalization rate, regardless of the degree of concomitant tricuspid regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrari et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR (n=345). Significant tricuspid regurgitation (moderate/severe) vs. None/mild tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated on 1-year mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.26-2.89, p=0.815). Concomitant significant tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVR did not significantly affect 1-year mortality compared to none/mild TR (9.1 vs 7.9 deaths per 100-person years; P=0.815).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: