This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients resistant to first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), only half develop the T790M mutation and thus qualify for the treatment using third-generation EGFR-TKIs. For T790M-negative patients, chemotherapy is the recommended second-line treatment. We compared the efficacy between third-generation EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy with or without first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs in T790M-negative patients. PATIENTS: This study included T790M-negative patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC and progressing after first-line treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Data on clinical characteristics, disease features, and survival were collected, including general conditions, medical history, imaging, histology, and molecular profiling. RESULTS: Of 82 patients progressing after first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs without acquiring T790M, 45 received third-generation EGFR-TKIs and 37 received chemotherapy and/or first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs. We found that third-generation EGFR-TKIs led to significantly longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) than other treatments [10.20 months vs. 5.70 months, p = 0.017]. Subgroup analyses indicated that third-generation EGFR-TKIs had similar mPFS to the chemotherapy group but were significantly superior to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs with or without chemotherapy (10.20 months vs. 4.80 months, p < 0.001; 10.20 months vs. 3.30 months, p = 0.004). The median overall survival (mOS) for patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs and with non-third-generation therapy was 39.80 months (95% CI 23.14 to 56.46) and 32.40 months (95% CI 18.71 to 46.09), p = 0.408, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Third-generation EGFR-TKIs significantly improved mPFS in T790M-negative patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC and resistant to first-line treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2500096109.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: