Key result
Running with whole-body electromyostimulation reduced time and velocity until exhaustion and caused a 7- to 9-fold higher impact on skeletal muscle compared to running without it.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the physiological and metabolic responses to running with whole-body electromyostimulation compared to running without electromyostimulation.
Does running with whole-body electromyostimulation alter physiological and metabolic responses compared to running without electromyostimulation in healthy participants?
RCT (n=20)
Random order
Does running with whole-body electromyostimulation alter physiological and metabolic responses compared to running without electromyostimulation in healthy participants?
Whole-body electromyostimulation during aerobic running induces earlier fatigue, shifts energy metabolism toward fat utilization, and significantly increases skeletal muscle impact.
wbEMS during running hastens exhaustion and raises muscle impact; challenges its use in aerobic training and extends RCT data on combined modalities.
Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the physiological and metabolic responses to running with whole-body electromyostimulation (wbEMS) compared to running without electromyostimulation (control, CG). Methods: Twenty healthy participants (9 male/11 female, age 42 ±7 years) conducted an incremental step test with respiratory gas analysis until exhaustion. Trials were conducted as wbEMS and CG in a random order. As outcome measures, (A) objective total exhaustion, (B) athletic responses (max. time and velocity) and (C) physiological and metabolic responses (V’O2/ kg, V’E, EE, RER, lactate) were compared. (D) The impact on the skeletal muscle was assessed prior, 48 h & 72 h after trial. Results: During both trials, participants (A) ran until total exhaustion. Nonetheless, (B) time and velocity till exhaustion as well as (C) RER prior to the first lactate threshold and V’E were reduced with wbEMS. All other correlates did not differ significantly between wbEMS and CG. Following 48 h and 72 h after the trial with wbEMS, (D) the impact on the skeletal muscle was 7- to 9-fold higher compared to baseline values. Values differed significantly to those after running without wbEMS. Conclusion: With the additional stimulation during voluntary activation, wbEMS induces earlier fatigue and a shift in energy metabolism toward fat utilization. Even during aerobic endurance tasks, a great impact on the skeletal muscle indicated by the rise in CK could be observed which promotes wbEMS as an alternative training stimulus that is easy-to-apply and effective during endurance training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krause et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy participants (n=20). Whole-body electromyostimulation (wbEMS) vs. Running without electromyostimulation (control) was evaluated on Objective total exhaustion, athletic responses (max. time and velocity), physiological and metabolic responses, and impact on skeletal muscle. Running with whole-body electromyostimulation reduced time and velocity until exhaustion and caused a 7- to 9-fold higher impact on skeletal muscle compared to running without it.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: