Key result
Cyclosporine A administered prior to reperfusion did not improve mitochondrial respiration compared to immediate full reperfusion (116 vs 117 nmol O2/min/mg protein), indicating its cardioprotective effect does not involve upstream calcineurin inhibition.
Why the study?
Does cyclosporine A improve mitochondrial respiration and calcium retention capacity in anesthetized pigs subjected to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion?
Does cyclosporine A improve mitochondrial respiration and calcium retention capacity in anesthetized pigs subjected to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion?
Cyclosporine A protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, but unlike ischemic postconditioning, it does not improve mitochondrial respiration or involve upstream calcineurin inhibition.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Challenges upstream calcineurin inhibition as cyclosporine A mechanism; leaves open alternative mitochondrial targets in porcine ischemia/reperfusion.
INTRODUCTION: Ischemic postconditioning (PoCo) and cyclosporine A (CysA) given prior to reperfusion reduce myocardial infarct size after ischemia/reperfusion. Ischemic postconditioning's protection is characterized by better preservation of mitochondrial respiration and calcium retention capacity. Protection by CysA is not entirely clear. Cyclosporine A inhibits not only mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening but also the phosphatase calcineurin. We have investigated whether CysA mediates protection not only by mPTP inhibition but also through a more upstream inhibition of calcineurin with subsequently better preserved mitochondrial respiration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anesthetized pigs were subjected to 90 min ischemia and 10 min reperfusion initiated with either PoCo (6 × 20 s reperfusion/re-occlusion; n = 9), CysA infusion (5 mg/kg i.v.; 5 min before reperfusion; n = 4), or immediate full reperfusion (IFR; n = 8). Mitochondria were isolated from myocardial tissue for measurement of respiration and calcium retention capacity. RESULTS: In mitochondria from ischemic/reperfused myocardium, ADP-stimulated complex I respiration was similar between CysA (116 ±11 nmol O2/min/mg protein) and IFR (117 ±8), but better preserved with PoCo (160 ±9; p < 0.05). Calcium retention capacity was greater with both PoCo and CysA (1096 ±45 and 1287 ±128 nmol Ca(2+)/mg protein) than with IFR (756 ±103; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine A's protection is not associated with improved mitochondrial respiration. Protection is unlikely related to an upstream calcineurin inhibition, but is indeed secondary to mPTP inhibition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gedik et al. (2013) studied Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (n=21). Cyclosporine A vs. Immediate full reperfusion (IFR) was evaluated on ADP-stimulated complex I respiration (nmol O2/min/mg protein). Cyclosporine A administered prior to reperfusion did not improve mitochondrial respiration compared to immediate full reperfusion (116 vs 117 nmol O2/min/mg protein), indicating its cardioprotective effect does not involve upstream calcineurin inhibition.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: