Key result
The Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.993; 95% CI 0.991-0.995; P<0.05).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury for professional Spanish-speaking soccer players.
Cross-Sectional (n=165)
Effect estimate: ICC 0.993 (95% CI 0.991-0.995)
p-value: p=<0.05
The Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury is a reliable and valid tool for assessing functional impact in professional soccer players.
May support standardized assessment in Spanish-speaking athletes; extends reliability data but leaves broader validation open.
Objective: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury for professional Spanish-speaking soccer players. Design: Clinical measurement study. Cross-cultural adaptation was conducted following international recommendations. Indicators of validity, reliability and responsiveness are provided. Subjects: The Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury scale was administered to 165 participants: 45 professional soccer players with acute hamstring muscle injury diagnosis, 40 healthy subjects, 40 individuals at-risk for a hamstring muscle injury and 40 patients with injuries of the lower limb other than hamstring muscle injury. Main measures: The Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury. Reference measures: Spanish version of the Quality of Life Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) and the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI). Results: Cronbach’s alpha (internal consistency) for the Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury scale was >0.8. The intraclass correlation coefficient using the two-way random model (ICC 2,1 ) (test–retest) was 0.993 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.991–0.995; P < 0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, a one-factor solution explained 85% of the variance. Subjects with hamstring muscle injury scored significantly lower than the other groups in the Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury scale ( P < 0.001). The Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury scale score within the hamstring muscle injury group showed moderate and significant correlations with SF-36 physical components (Spearman’s r s > 0.6; P < 0.001), and LLFI score at baseline ( r s = 0.42; P < 0.01). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change threshold (MDC 95% ) were 2.6 and 7.2 points, respectively. The responsiveness indicators have an effect size of 3.62, and the standardized response mean is 3.24. Conclusion: The Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury scale showed satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be considered a reliable and valid instrument to assess the functional impact of acute hamstring muscle injury in professional Spanish-speaking football players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández-Sánchez et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute hamstring injury (n=165). Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury vs. Healthy subjects, at-risk individuals, and patients with other lower limb injuries was evaluated on Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) (ICC 0.993, 95% CI 0.991-0.995, p=<0.05). The Spanish version of the Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.993; 95% CI 0.991-0.995; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: