Key result
5F catheters were inferior to 7/8F catheters for torque control, ease of engaging coronary ostia, and quality of angiograms.
Why the study?
Does the use of 5F catheters improve procedural outcomes compared to 7/8F catheters in patients undergoing first left heart cardiac catheterization?
RCT (n=52)
Does the use of 5F catheters improve procedural outcomes compared to 7/8F catheters in patients undergoing first left heart cardiac catheterization?
The routine use of 5F catheters for left heart catheterization is not recommended due to inferior torque control, difficulty engaging ostia, and poorer angiogram quality compared to 7/8F catheters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discourages routine 5F catheter use in left heart catheterization; reinforces 7/8F preference for procedural performance.
Fifty-two patients were randomized into two groups of 26 to the use of either 5 or 7/8F catheters for their first left heart cardiac catheterization. Clinical characteristics for the two groups were similar. 5F catheters were significantly inferior to 7/8F catheters in terms of torque control (P less than .001), ease of engaging coronary ostia (P less than .001), and quality of angiograms (P less than .05). Nine patients in the 5F group required a change to 7/8F catheters for completion of the procedure. There was no difference in procedure time or fluoroscopy time between the groups. Time to haemostasis was significantly shorter in the 5F group (P less than .01), but there was no difference between groups with respect to haematoma formation or rebleed after haemostasis. We conclude the slight advantage of 5F catheters in terms of haemostasis is outweighed by many disadvantages. Their routine use in cardiac catheterization, at least at this time, cannot be recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hui et al. (1990) conducted an RCT in First left heart cardiac catheterization (n=52). 5F catheters vs. 7/8F catheters was evaluated on Torque control, ease of engaging coronary ostia, and quality of angiograms (p=<0.001). 5F catheters were inferior to 7/8F catheters for torque control, ease of engaging coronary ostia, and quality of angiograms.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: