Key result
Anticoagulation in pediatric patients with tumor thrombus was associated with bleeding complications in 40% of treated patients (P<0.05) and showed response in only 20%.
Why the study?
Children with cancer are at higher risk of thrombosis, but the role of anticoagulation for tumor thrombus in pediatric patients is unclear.
Does anticoagulation improve outcomes or increase bleeding in pediatric patients with tumor thrombus?
Cohort (n=50)
No
Does anticoagulation improve outcomes or increase bleeding in pediatric patients with tumor thrombus?
Routine initiation of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with tumor thrombus is associated with a significant trend toward higher bleeding complications without clear benefit.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports caution against routine anticoagulation in pediatric tumor thrombus; leaves open need for prospective trials.
Background: Children with cancer diagnosis are overall at a higher risk of thrombosis. For a newly diagnosed bland thrombus, patients are commonly started on anticoagulants to prevent further extension and embolization of the clot. In the rare instance that a pediatric patient has a tumor thrombus, the role of anticoagulation is less clear. Procedure/Methods: Patients under 21 years of age with a finding of tumor thrombus on imaging from 2010-2020 at Texas Children’s Hospital were identified and their medical records were reviewed. Results: A total of 50 patients were identified. Most thrombi were incidental findings at diagnosis; however, there were two patients who presented with pulmonary embolism (PE). Inferior Vena Cava extension was noted in 36% of the patients and 24% patients had an intracardiac tumor thrombus. Hepatoblastoma (26%) was the most common malignancy associated with tumor thrombus. Anticoagulation was initiated in 10 patients (20%). Only 2 of these 10 patients showed response to anticoagulation. However, 40% (4/10) patients in the anticoagulation cohort were noted to have bleeding complications (p <.05). Conclusion: Children with intravascular extension of solid tumors were not commonly started on anticoagulation at the time of diagnosis, irrespective of the extent of tumor thrombus. Furthermore, we observed a significant trend toward higher incidence of bleeding complications after initiation of anticoagulation. There is inadequate evidence at this time to support routine initiation of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with intravascular extension of solid tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mullikin et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Tumor thrombus in pediatric cancer (n=50). Anticoagulation vs. No anticoagulation was evaluated on Bleeding complications (p=<.05). Anticoagulation in pediatric patients with tumor thrombus was associated with bleeding complications in 40% of treated patients (P<0.05) and showed response in only 20%.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: