Key result
ACP-coated membranes resulted in a significantly shorter time to high circuit pressure compared to IHP-coated membranes (28 vs 54 min) but preserved higher levels of anticoagulant proteins.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to clarify the activity of anticoagulant proteins on acrylate-copolymer-coated membranes compared to heparin-immobilized membranes in extracorporeal circulation.
Does an ACP-coated membrane compared to an IHP-coated membrane improve preservation of anticoagulant proteins and delay thrombogenicity in extracorporeal circulation circuits?
Does an ACP-coated membrane compared to an IHP-coated membrane improve preservation of anticoagulant proteins and delay thrombogenicity in extracorporeal circulation circuits?
Absolute Event Rate: 28% vs 54%
p-value: p=<0.05
ACP-coated membranes in extracorporeal circulation circuits preserve anticoagulant proteins better than heparin-coated membranes, despite a shorter time to circuit thrombogenicity.
May support ACP-coated membranes for protein preservation in circuits; animal data leave clinical translation unproven.
Introduction We performed in vitro experiments using whole human blood without anticoagulants to clarify the activity of anticoagulant proteins on membranes coated with acrylate-copolymer (ACP) with a hydrophilic blood-contacting layer compared to those coated by immobilizing heparin (IHP) in extracorporeal circulation. Methods Whole human blood from healthy volunteers was recirculated in two types of experimental circuits with an ACP-coated reservoir and tubes and an ACP-coated or IHP-coated membrane. To compare the fluctuation of anticoagulant proteins, the circuit pressure at the inlet and outlet of the membrane was measured every 5 min; antithrombin antigen (ATQ), antithrombin activity, protein-C quantitation (PCQ), protein-C activity, protein-S free antigen (PSQ), and protein-S activity were measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min in each experiment ( n = 5). Results The time taken to achieve high circuit pressure (> 300 mmHg) at the inlet of the membrane was significantly shorter in the ACP-coated membrane circuit (28 ± 2.7 min) than in the IHP-coated membrane circuit (54 ± 24 min); however, the ATQ, PCQ, and PSQ at 180 min of recirculation were significantly higher in the former than in the latter (all p < .05). Conclusions ACP-coated membranes can prevent the consumption of anticoagulant proteins but cannot delay circuit thrombogenicity compared to IHP-coated membranes. Considering patient care during the post-extracorporeal circulation period, the use of ACP coating, which can preserve anticoagulant protein, is better in extracorporeal circulation circuits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagaya et al. (2022) studied Healthy volunteers (n=5). Acrylate-copolymer (ACP)-coated membrane vs. Immobilizing heparin (IHP)-coated membrane was evaluated on Time taken to achieve high circuit pressure (> 300 mmHg) at the inlet of the membrane (p=<0.05). ACP-coated membranes resulted in a significantly shorter time to high circuit pressure compared to IHP-coated membranes (28 vs 54 min) but preserved higher levels of anticoagulant proteins.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: