Why the study?
Does protamine dosing based on individual heparin dose-response curves improve heparin reversal compared to a routine protocol in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery?
Does protamine dosing based on individual heparin dose-response curves improve heparin reversal compared to a routine protocol in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery?
Individualized protamine dosing based on heparin dose-response curves does not improve heparin reversal compared to a routine protocol, and ACT correlates poorly with plasma heparin levels during extracorporeal circulation.
ACT correlates poorly with heparin during bypass; challenges consensus on monitoring and leaves individualized protamine dosing unproven.
The anticoagulant effect of heparin was studied in 20 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery. The protamine dose necessary to reverse heparin after extracorporeal circulation (ECC) was assessed in ten patients from individual heparin dose-response curves (HDR group). The other ten patients received protamine according to a routine protocol (control group). The protamine administration was followed in both groups by injection of 3-5 g tranexamic acid (Cyklokapron). A wide range of sensitivity to heparin was shown by the patients. Although almost twice as much protamine was given to the control group as to the HDR group, the effect on heparin reversal was similar. The variability of protamine dose did not influence the post-bypass levels of fibrinogen, AT-III, activated coagulation time (ACT) or Cephotest, and fibrinolysis was not observed in either of the groups. During ECC there was poor correlation between ACT and plasma heparin levels, and the use of heparin dose-response curves was grossly misleading in regard to true heparin concentration. The postoperative bleeding was not related to the levels of heparin or coagulation parameters after heparin reversal. The concentrations of fibrinogen and AT-III showed variations dependent on the changes in haematocrit. A number of factors other than heparin that influence ACT are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ottesen et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: