Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective This meta-analysis assessed the 30+ nerve excitability indices generated by the TROND protocol to identify potential biomarkers for ALS. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases, to identify human studies that tested median motor axons. Forest Plot analyses were performed using a random-effects model to determine the pooled effect (Z-score), heterogeneity (I 2 ), and Cohen’s d for potential biomarker identification. Results Out of 2866 studies, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, incorporating data from 719 controls and 942 ALS patients. Seven indices emerged as potential biomarkers: TEd 90-100 ms, strength-duration time constant (SDTC), superexcitability, TEd 40-60 ms, resting I/V slope, 50% depolarizing I/V, and subexcitability (ranked by the magnitude of the difference between patients and controls from largest to smallest). In a sensitivity analysis focusing on patients with larger compound muscle action potentials (CMAP), only four indices were potential biomarkers: TEd 10-20 ms, TEd 90-100 ms, superexcitability, and SDTC. Conclusion Among the extensive range of 30+ excitability indices generated by the TROND protocol, we have identified seven indices that effectively differentiate ALS patients from healthy controls. Furthermore, a smaller subset of four indices shows promise as potential biomarkers when the CMAP remains relatively large. However, most studies were considered to be at moderate risk of bias due to case-control designs and absence of sensitivity and specificity calculations, underscoring the need for more prospective diagnostic test-accuracy studies with appropriate disease controls. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This meta-analysis uncovers seven potential axonal excitability biomarkers for lower motor neuron pathology in ALS, shedding light on ion channel dysfunction. The identified dysfunction aligns with the primary pathology – protein homeostasis disruption. These biomarkers could fill a gap to detect pre-symptomatic spread of the disease in the spinal cord and monitor treatments targeting protein homeostasis and limiting spread, towards enhancing patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lugg et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: