Key result
In the multicenter PAINT trial, pooled biodegradable polymer DESs showed similar rates of cardiac death or MI (9% vs 7.1%; p=0.6) but reduced repeat interventions (10% vs 29.9%; p<0.01) at 3 years compared to bare stents.
Why the study?
Does the Supralimus sirolimus-eluting stent reduce reintervention and improve safety compared to bare metal stents in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Does the Supralimus sirolimus-eluting stent reduce reintervention and improve safety compared to bare metal stents in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 7.1%
p-value: p=0.6
The Supralimus biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent is effective in reducing reintervention compared to bare metal stents, with a potentially improved safety profile regarding late-term thrombosis.
May reduce repeat interventions without excess cardiac events; leaves open need for contemporary randomized confirmation.
The use of biodegradable polymeric coatings has emerged as a potential bioengineering target to improve the vascular compatibility of coronary drug-eluting stents (DESs). This review summarizes the main features and scientific facts about the Supralimus sirolimus-eluting stent (Sahajanand Medical Technologies Ltd, Surat, India), which is a biodegradable polymer-based, sirolimus-eluting metallic stent that was recently introduced for routine use in Europe. The novel stent is built on a stainless steel platform, coated with a blend of biodegradable polymers (poly-l-lactide, poly-dl-lactide-co-glycolide and polyvinyl pyrrolidone; coating thickness is 4-5 µm). The active agent is the antiproliferative sirolimus in a dose load of 1.4 µg/mm(2), which is released within 48 days. The Supralimus stent was initially evaluated in the single-arm SERIES-I study, which showed binary angiographic restenosis rates of 0% (in-stent) and 1.7% (in-segment) and an in-stent late lumen loss of 0.09 ± 0.28 mm. The multicenter randomized PAINT trial compared two DESs with identical metallic platforms and biodegradable polymer carriers, but different agents (Infinnium [Sahajanand Medical Technologies Pvt Ltd] paclitaxel-eluting stent or Supralimus sirolimus-eluting stent) against bare stents. After 3 years, the pooled DES population had similar rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (9 vs 7.1%; p = 0.6), but a lower risk of repeat interventions (10 vs 29.9%; p < 0.01) than controls with bare stents. The incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis in the pooled DES group was 2.3% (1st year: 1.8%; 2nd year: 0.4% and 3rd year: 0%). These results demonstrate that the novel Supralimus stents are effective in reducing reintervention, while potentially improving the safety profile by decreasing the risk of late-term thrombosis, even though further studies would be necessary to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lemos et al. (2013) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents (pooled Supralimus and Infinnium) vs. Bare metal stents was evaluated on Cardiac death or myocardial infarction (p=0.6). In the multicenter PAINT trial, pooled biodegradable polymer DESs showed similar rates of cardiac death or MI (9% vs 7.1%; p=0.6) but reduced repeat interventions (10% vs 29.9%; p<0.01) at 3 years compared to bare stents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: