Key result
Standard-dose growth hormone treatment (0.167 mg/kg/week) did not significantly improve adult height or change in height standard deviation score in non-growth hormone deficient short children.
Why the study?
Does standard-dose growth hormone treatment improve adult height in non-growth hormone deficient short children?
Cohort (n=386)
Yes
Does standard-dose growth hormone treatment improve adult height in non-growth hormone deficient short children?
Standard-dose growth hormone treatment (0.167 mg/kg/week) does not improve adult height in Japanese non-growth hormone deficient short children compared to untreated controls.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standard-dose GH was not associated with adult height gains in non-GHD children; leaves open higher-dose or subgroup efficacy in prospective trials.
It is still in doubt whether the standard-dose growth hormone (GH) used in Japan (0.5 IU/kg/week, 0.167 mg/kg/week) for growth hormone deficiency is effective for achieving significant adult height improvement in non-growth hormone deficient (non-GHD) short children. We compared the growth of GH-treated non-GHD short children with that of untreated short children to examine the effect of standard-dose GH treatment on non-GHD short children. GH treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) was started before the age of 11 yr in 64 boys and 76 girls with non-GHD short stature registered at the Foundation for Growth Science who have now reached their adult height. In 119 untreated boys and 127 untreated girls whose height standard deviation score (SDS) was below -2 SD at the age of 6 yr, height growth was followed until 17 yr. Height SDS was significantly lower before GH treatment in the GH-treated group than at the age of 6 yr in the untreated group, in both sexes. Adult height and adult height SDS were significantly greater in the untreated group than in the GH-treated group, in both sexes, although the change in height SDS did not differ significantly. Height SDS was significantly lower before GH treatment in the GH-treated group than at the age of 6 yr in the untreated group, so 57 boys and 57 girls whose height SDS at the age of 6 yr in the untreated group closely matched the height SDS before GH treatment in the GH-treated group were chosen for comparison. Height SDS did not differ significantly between the GH-treated group before GH treatment and the untreated group at the age of 6 yr, nor were there differences between these subgroups in adult height, adult height SDS, or height SDS change, in either sex. The effect of GH treatment is reported to be dose-dependent and doses over 0.23 mg/kg/week are reported to be necessary to improve adult height in non-GHD short children. Currently, the GH dose is fixed at 0.175 mg/kg/week in Japan, and we expected to find, and indeed concluded, that ordinary GH treatment in Japanese, non-GHD short children does not improve adult height.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Non-growth hormone deficient short stature (n=386). Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) vs. Untreated short children was evaluated on Change in height standard deviation score (SDS) to adult height (p=>0.05). Standard-dose growth hormone treatment (0.167 mg/kg/week) did not significantly improve adult height or change in height standard deviation score in non-growth hormone deficient short children.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: