Key result
Growth hormone treatment in the 2000s resulted in a significantly greater cumulative height standard deviation score change over three years compared to the 1990s cohort.
Why the study?
Does growth hormone treatment in the 2000s improve height SDS more than treatment in the 1990s in prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency?
Cohort (n=1,533)
Yes
Does growth hormone treatment in the 2000s improve height SDS more than treatment in the 1990s in prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Growth hormone treatment for prepubertal children with GHD in Japan showed improved height outcomes in the 2000s compared to the 1990s, potentially due to dose standardization.
Growth hormone (GH) treatment for children with GH deficiency (GHD) is effective in improving adult height. To achieve favorable effects, GH treatment before puberty is very important, because prepubertal height gain is highly correlated with total height gain. However, no report has studied the effects by analyzing a nationwide data from recent GHD patients in Japan. We investigated the response to GH treatment using data compiled in the Foundation for Growth Science in Japan, and compared the effects between the 1990s and 2000s using analysis of covariance. We analyzed 534 prepubertal GHD subjects treated in the 2000s with three consecutive years of data from the start and investigated predictive factors for the effects. The cumulative height standard deviation score (SDS) change over three years of GH treatment was 0.91 ± 0.57 and 1.20 ± 0.62 in the 1990s and 2000s, respectively. Subjects in the 2000s were divided into three groups by severity, and the cumulative height SDS was 1.60 ± 0.93, 1.20 ± 0.54, and 1.00 ± 0.40 indicating severe, moderate, and mild GHD, respectively. Age and height SDS at the start and severity were identified as independent predictive factors. We also found a significant difference in the effects between the two cohorts after adjusting for the different factors (regression coefficient: -0.069, 95% confidence interval: -0.11 to -0.030, p = 0.0006), which might be due to the GH dose effect. We conclude that the effects of GH treatment in the 2000s had improved compared with those in the 1990s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isojima et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Growth hormone deficiency (n=1,533). Growth hormone treatment in the 2000s vs. Growth hormone treatment in the 1990s was evaluated on Cumulative height standard deviation score (SDS) change over three years of treatment (Regression coefficient -0.069, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.030, p=0.0006). Growth hormone treatment in the 2000s resulted in a significantly greater cumulative height standard deviation score change over three years compared to the 1990s cohort.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: