Key result
Patients with atrial fibrillation using NOACs had a significantly lower risk of incident dementia compared to those using warfarin (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.92; P=0.0004).
Why the study?
Patients with AF face an increased risk of dementia, but results remain inconsistent regarding dementia risk across different anticoagulants.
Does NOAC therapy reduce the risk of incident dementia compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=12,068)
Yes
Does NOAC therapy reduce the risk of incident dementia compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
In patients with atrial fibrillation, the use of NOACs is associated with a significantly lower risk of incident dementia compared to warfarin.
NOAC use was associated with lower dementia risk versus warfarin in AF; extends observational data but leaves causality open for RCTs.
Background A higher risk of developing dementia is observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Results are inconsistent regarding the risk of dementia when patients with AF use different anticoagulants. We aimed to investigate the risk of dementia in patients with AF receiving non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with those receiving warfarin. Methods and Results We conducted a nationwide population‐based cohort study of incident cases using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We initially enlisted all incident cases of AF and then selected those treated with either NOACs or warfarin for at least 90 days between 2012 and 2016. First‐ever diagnosis of dementia was the primary outcome. We performed propensity score matching to minimize the difference between each cohort. We used the Fine and Gray competing risk regression model to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia. We recruited 12 068 patients with AF (6034 patients in each cohort). The mean follow‐up time was 3.27 and 3.08 years in the groups using NOACs and warfarin, respectively. Compared with the HR for the group using warfarin, the HR for dementia was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73–0.92; P =0.0004) in the group using NOACs. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that users of NOAC aged 65 to 74 years, with a high risk of stroke or bleeding were associated with a lower risk of dementia than users of warfarin with similar characteristics. Conclusions Patients with AF using NOACs were associated with a lower risk of dementia than those using warfarin. Further randomized clinical trials are greatly needed to prove these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=12,068). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on First-ever diagnosis of dementia (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92, p=0.0004). Patients with atrial fibrillation using NOACs had a significantly lower risk of incident dementia compared to those using warfarin (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.92; P=0.0004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: