Key result
Oral anticoagulant use was associated with a decreased risk of dementia compared with nonuse in patients with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.84-0.92).
Why the study?
Studies evaluating a possible protective effect of oral anticoagulants against dementia in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been inconsistent and hampered by methodological limitations.
Does oral anticoagulant use reduce the incidence of dementia in patients aged 50 years or older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=142,227)
Does oral anticoagulant use reduce the incidence of dementia in patients aged 50 years or older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In patients with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulant use is associated with a decreased risk of dementia, particularly in those aged 75 years and older.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with an increased risk of dementia. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are essential for stroke prevention in NVAF, and studies have shown a possible protective effect on dementia. However, findings have been inconsistent and hampered by methodological limitations. Thus, we assessed whether the use of OACs is associated with a decreased incidence of dementia in patients with NVAF. In addition, we explored the impact of the cumulative duration of OAC use on the incidence of dementia. METHODS: Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we formed a cohort of all patients aged 50 years or older with an incident diagnosis of NVAF between 1988 and 2017 and no prior OAC use, with a follow-up until 2019. Patients were considered unexposed until 6 months after their first OAC prescription for latency considerations and exposed thereafter until the end of follow-up. We used time-dependent Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for 54 covariates, with 95% CIs for dementia associated with OAC use, compared with nonuse. We also assessed whether the risk varied with the cumulative duration of OAC use, compared with nonuse, by comparing prespecified exposure categories defined in a time-varying manner and by modeling the HR using a restricted cubic spline. RESULTS: The cohort included 142,227 patients with NVAF, with 8,023 cases of dementia over 662,667 person-years of follow-up (incidence rate 12.1, 95% CI 11.9-12.4 per 1,000 person-years). OAC use was associated with a decreased risk of dementia (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92) compared with nonuse. A restricted cubic spline also indicated a decreased risk of dementia, reaching a low at approximately 1.5 years of cumulative OAC use and stabilizing thereafter. Moreover, OAC use decreased the risk in patients aged 75 years and older (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.89), but not in younger patients (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.10). DISCUSSION: In patients with incident NVAF, OACs were associated with a decreased risk of dementia, particularly in elderly individuals. This warrants consideration when weighing the risks and benefits of anticoagulation in this population. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with NVAF, OAC use (vs nonuse) is associated with a decreased risk of dementia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=142,227). Oral anticoagulants (OACs) vs. Nonuse was evaluated on Incidence of dementia (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92). Oral anticoagulant use was associated with a decreased risk of dementia compared with nonuse in patients with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.84-0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: