Key result
Endovascular fenestration using a NRG radiofrequency transseptal needle successfully relieved symptoms in a patient with malperfusion syndrome of type B aortic dissection.
Why the study?
Malperfusion syndrome is one of the most significant adverse events in aortic dissection disease and often requires invasive strategies to improve ischemia.
Does endovascular fenestration therapy using a radiofrequency transseptal needle relieve symptoms in a patient with malperfusion syndrome of type B aortic dissection?
Case Report (n=1)
Does endovascular fenestration therapy using a radiofrequency transseptal needle relieve symptoms in a patient with malperfusion syndrome of type B aortic dissection?
Endovascular fenestration using a radiofrequency transseptal needle is a feasible novel method for treating malperfusion syndrome in type B aortic dissection.
May relieve malperfusion symptoms in type B dissection; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Malperfusion syndrome is considered one of the most significant adverse events in aortic dissection disease and often requires invasive strategies to improve ischemia. We report the case of a patient who was presented with worsening claudication and leg rest pain due to malperfusion syndrome of type B aortic dissection. We successfully performed endovascular fenestration therapy to relieve the symptom by using a NRG radiofrequency transseptal needle (Baylis Medical, Montreal, Canada). We suggest that this novel method would be available for the patients with malperfusion syndrome of aortic dissection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yagi et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Malperfusion syndrome of type B aortic dissection (n=1). Endovascular fenestration using a NRG radiofrequency transseptal needle was evaluated on Symptom relief. Endovascular fenestration using a NRG radiofrequency transseptal needle successfully relieved symptoms in a patient with malperfusion syndrome of type B aortic dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: