Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Aim: This study assessed the position of the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal relative to the distobuccal (DB) and palatal (P) canals of maxillary molars in an Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods:This cross-sectional study evaluated 110 CBCT scans of patients retrieved from a radiology clinic in Isfahan, Iran.The MB1-MB2 inter-orifice distance, and the angle formed between the MB1-MB2 line and the DB-P line were measured on reconstructed axial sections.The angulation of MB2 orifice relative to the DB and P canals was categorized as positive, negative, and parallel.Data were compared by Student t-test, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test (alpha=0.05). Results:The mean MB1-MB2 inter-orifice distance was not significantly different in first and second molars, in the right and left sides, or in males and females (P>0.05).Negative angulation of MB2 orifice relative to the DB and P canals had the highest frequency (72.7%) followed by positive angulation (23.6%).Angulation of MB2 orifice had no significant correlation with tooth type (first/second molar), laterality, or gender (P>0.05). Conclusion:The mean MB1-MB2 inter-orifice distance had no significant correlation with tooth type, laterality, or gender.Negative angulation of the MB2 relative to the DB and P canals had the highest frequency, indicating that if a hypothetical line is drawn from the MB1 orifice parallel to the DB-P line, the MB2 orifice would be probably at the distal of this line.Angulation of MB2 orifice had no significant correlation with tooth type, laterality, or gender.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mosadeghian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: