Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: A paediatric directed donation programme (DDP) was instituted by Women's and Children's Health in conjunction with the Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, in response to public demand following a case of transfusion-transmitted HIV. This audit assesses the first 18 months of the programme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis, from February 2000 to July 2001, examining the number of units of blood requested, donated, and transfused, as well as the use of allogeneic (non-directed) blood. RESULTS: The DDP received 125 referrals. Most (78%) were for elective surgery. Of the 89 eligible children, 76% (68) had blood donated for them by an ABO/Rhesus-compatible parent, 81% of whom were first-time blood-donors. No donor tested positive for infectious markers. In total, 221 units of blood were requested and 116 units were collected. Non-collection was mainly a result of parent-child ABO incompatibility or medical ineligibility of the proposed donor. Of the children for whom blood was collected, 28 (41%) received no transfusion and eight (12%) received non-directed components in addition to DDP blood; thus, 32 (47%) received solely the blood from their directed donor. Of the units collected, 53 (46%) were transfused and 63 (54%) were discarded. CONCLUSIONS: While the paediatric DDP serves a community need, the programme has a high wastage rate, is time-consuming, labour-intensive and an expensive alternative when compared with the provision of non-directed volunteer blood. In continuing the programme, appropriateness of referral needs to be refined to reduce wastage rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knuckey et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: