Key result
The PaTH intervention and usual care both significantly reduced 30-year cardiovascular risk scores at 6 months in spouses of coronary artery bypass patients, with no group differences.
Why the study?
Does the Partners Together in Health (PaTH) intervention reduce 30-year cardiovascular risk in spouses of coronary artery bypass patients compared to usual care?
Does the Partners Together in Health (PaTH) intervention reduce 30-year cardiovascular risk in spouses of coronary artery bypass patients compared to usual care?
Spousal participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs alongside patients effectively reduces the spouses' own 30-year cardiovascular risk, primarily driven by exercise.
Spousal cardiac rehab participation may lower 30-year CV risk; pilot data leave open PaTH's added benefit over usual care.
Few studies have examined risk-reducing interventions in spouses of coronary artery bypass patients. This study examined the effects of the Partners Together in Health (PaTH) intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors. Spouses in the experimental group (n = 17/group) attended cardiac rehabilitation with patients and made the same physical activity and healthy eating changes as patients. Spouses in the usual care group attended educational classes with patients. Spouses' 30-year cardiovascular risk was calculated using the Lifetime Risk Scale before and after cardiac rehabilitation (3 months), and at 6 months. Spouses in both groups significantly reduced 30-year risk scores at 3 and 6 months. Exercise was the key ingredient in lowering risk. There was a trend toward reduction in systolic blood pressure and an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both groups. Although there were no group differences, having spouses participate in cardiac rehabilitation with the patient was effective for reducing spouses' cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yates et al. (2014) studied Spouses of coronary artery bypass patients (n=34). Partners Together in Health (PaTH) intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on 30-year cardiovascular risk using the Lifetime Risk Scale. The PaTH intervention and usual care both significantly reduced 30-year cardiovascular risk scores at 6 months in spouses of coronary artery bypass patients, with no group differences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: