Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This report describes the synthesis, characterization, and ligand exchange studies of a family of cationic acetonitrile adducts of nickel featuring resorcinol-based, pincer-type POCOP ligands. The compounds [(R-POCOP R ′ )Ni(NCMe)][OSO 2 CF 3 ] (R-POCOP R ′ = 2,6-(R′ 2 PO) 2 (R n C 6 H 3– n ); R′ = i- Pr: R = H ( 1 ), p- Me ( 2 ), p- OMe ( 3 ), p- CO 2 Me ( 4 ), p- Br ( 5 ), m,m-t -Bu 2 ( 6 ), m- OMe ( 7 ), m- CO 2 Me ( 8 ); R′ = t- Bu: R = H ( 9 ), p- CO 2 Me ( 10 )) were prepared in 80–93% yields by reacting the corresponding charge-neutral bromo derivatives with Ag(OSO 2 CF 3 ) in acetonitrile. The impact of the R- and R′-substituents on electronics and structures of 1 – 10 have been probed by NMR, UV–vis, and IR spectra, X-ray crystallography, and cyclic voltammetry measurements. The observed ν(C≡N) values were found to increase with the increasing electron-withdrawing nature of R, i.e., in the order 7 < 3 ∼ 2 ∼ 6 < 1 < 5 ∼ 8 < 4 and 9 < 10 . This trend is consistent with the anticipation that enhanced electrophilicity of the nickel center should result in an increase in net MeCN→Ni σ-donation. That this transfer of electron density from acetonitrile to the nickel center does not adequately counteract the impact of electron-withdrawing substituents was evident from the measured redox potentials: the MeO 2 C-substituted cations showed the highest oxidation potentials. Moreover, all cationic adducts showed greater oxidation potentials compared with their corresponding charge-neutral bromo precursors. Equilibrium studies conducted with selected [(R-POCOP R ′ )Ni(NCMe)][OSO 2 CF 3 ] and (R-POCOP R ′ )NiBr (R′ = i -Pr) have confirmed facile MeCN/Br exchange between these derivatives and show that the cationic adducts are stabilized with MeO-POCOP, whereas the charge-neutral bromo species are stabilized with MeO 2 C-POCOP. The potential implications of these findings for the catalytic reactivities of the title cationic complexes have been discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lapointe et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: