Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pretreatment of pituitary cell cultures with GnRH causes altered gonadotrope responsiveness to LH secretagogues. The precise mechanism by which this occurs is not understood. Because a G protein appears to be activated after GnRH stimulation of the gonadotrope, a role for this moiety in GnRH-stimulated alterations in gonadotrope responsiveness was assessed. We show that 3 h pretreatment of pituitary cell cultures with 10 mM NaF (a G protein activator), resulted in decreased gonadotrope responsiveness to subsequent GnRH treatment (3 h, 100 nM; 34.4 +/- 1.6% vs. 23.4 +/- 1.5% of total cellular LH). NaF-provoked gonadotrope desensitization to GnRH also occurred in the presence of 3 mM EGTA and in cells which had been depleted of protein kinase C. Desensitization to GnRH did not occur in response to pretreatment with (Bu)2cAMP (8 h, 1 mM). In addition, neither GnRH nor NaF stimulated inositol phosphate production above basal levels after the NaF pretreatment. GnRH receptor binding also decreased by 30% with NaF pretreatment. In contrast, 3 h NaF (10 mM) pretreatment enhanced responsiveness of the gonadotrope to the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 in a protein kinase C- and cAMP-dependent manner. Responsiveness to the phorbol ester, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, was also increased, whereas responsiveness to the Ca2+ channel activator maitotoxin was unchanged. These data suggest that G protein activation by NaF provokes gonadotrope desensitization to GnRH stimulation by both decreasing receptor numbers and by uncoupling of the receptors from inositol phosphate production. In addition, a distinct G protein action appears to be involved in sensitizing the gonadotrope to A23187 and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hawes et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: