Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The evaluation and comparison of crowd simulation algorithms (complex, high-dimensional, multi-scale systems) is an important question. “Realism” being dependent on target applications, comparisons with real measurements are not easy. Promising solutions have been suggested for such evaluations (Guy et al. (2012)). Here, the authors address estimating simulation parameters before evaluating: what do evaluation results mean if the assessed model is not performing at its best? The authors propose an optimization-based approach encompassing: reference data, metrics, simulation algorithms and optimization techniques. The authors demonstrate finding good parameter values setting simulation results as close as possible to reference data, enabling fair and meaningful comparisons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolinski et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: