Why the study?
The study evaluated AF patients' perceptions of anticoagulation treatment with dabigatran or a VKA for stroke prevention.
Does dabigatran improve treatment satisfaction and convenience compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=9,465)
Yes
Does dabigatran improve treatment satisfaction and convenience compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dabigatran is associated with significantly higher patient-reported treatment convenience and satisfaction compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Objective: We evaluated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients' perceptions of anticoagulation treatment with dabigatran or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for stroke prevention, according to accepted indications. Methods: The RE-SONANCE observational, prospective, multicentre, international study used the validated Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q) to assess patients with AF already taking a VKA who were switched to dabigatran (cohort A), and newly diagnosed patients initiated on either dabigatran or a VKA (cohort B). Visit 1 (V1) was at baseline, and visit 2 (V2) and visit 3 (V3) were at 30-45 and 150-210 days after baseline, respectively. Primary outcomes were treatment satisfaction and convenience in cohort A at V2 and V3 versus baseline, and in cohort B for dabigatran and a VKA at V2 and V3. Results: The main analysis set comprised 4100 patients in cohort A and 5365 in cohort B (dabigatran: 3179; VKA: 2186). In cohort A, PACT-Q2 improved significantly (p<0.001 for all) for treatment convenience (mean change V1 vs V2=20.72; SD=21.50; V1 vs V3=24.54; SD=22.85) and treatment satisfaction (mean change V1 vs V2=17.60; SD=18.76; V1 vs V3=21.04; SD=20.24). In cohort B, mean PACT-Q2 scores at V2 and V3 were significantly higher (p<0.001 for all) for dabigatran versus a VKA for treatment convenience (V2=18.38; SE =0.51; V3=23.34; SE=0.51) and satisfaction (V2=15.88; SE=0.39; V3=19.01; SE=0.41). Conclusions: Switching to dabigatran from long-term VKA therapy or newly initiated dabigatran is associated with improved patient treatment convenience and satisfaction compared with VKA therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinereanu et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=9,465). Dabigatran vs. Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) was evaluated on Treatment satisfaction and convenience (PACT-Q2 scores) (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: