Key result
Dabigatran links to better patient satisfaction and convenience versus VKAs at 6 months.
Why the study?
Real-world data regarding patient preference, satisfaction, and convenience with dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists for stroke prophylaxis in Asian patients with NVAF were not available.
Does dabigatran improve treatment satisfaction and convenience compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=934)
Yes
Does dabigatran improve treatment satisfaction and convenience compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=0.0300
Dabigatran is associated with significantly better patient-reported treatment convenience and satisfaction compared to VKAs in newly diagnosed NVAF patients.
May inform shared decisions on anticoagulation; leaves open effects on adherence or outcomes pending randomized data.
PURPOSE: Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Real-world data about patient preference, satisfaction and convenience in patients in Asia are not available. The study aimed to explore the perception of patients with newly diagnosed NVAF regarding dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), when used for stroke prevention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multinational, multicentre, non-interventional study involving 49 sites across 5 countries in South East Asia and South Korea where 934 patients newly diagnosed with NVAF were initiated on either dabigatran (N=591) or VKA (N=343). Data were collected at baseline and over two follow-up visits across 6 months. Treatment satisfaction and patient convenience were evaluated using the Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire-2 (PACT-Q2). RESULTS: -VASc score was 2.4±1.5, and mean HAS-BLED score was 1.2±0.9. At baseline, patients initiated on dabigatran had higher stroke risk, bleeding risk, creatinine clearance and proportion of patients with concomitant illnesses compared with patients initiated on VKAs. Treatment convenience was perceived to be significantly better with dabigatran versus VKAs at visits 2 and 3 (p=0.0423 and 0.0287, respectively). Treatment satisfaction was significantly better with dabigatran compared with VKAs at visit 3 (p=0.0300). CONCLUSION: In this study, dabigatran is associated with better patient perception in terms of treatment convenience and satisfaction compared with VKAs when used for stroke prevention in newly diagnosed NVAF patients from South East Asia and South Korea. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02849509. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patient satisfaction with dabigatran versus VKAs in South East Asia. Patients with atrial fibrillation are at high risk of stroke and require anticoagulants for stroke prevention. Two such anticoagulants are dabigatran and VKAs. We wanted to compare the extent of satisfaction and treatment convenience among newly diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation from the South East Asian region when they were given either dabigatran or VKAs. Consenting patients filled out a standardised questionnaire called the PACT-Q2 over three visits after they were started on either dabigatran (591 patients) or VKAs (343 patients). We found that satisfaction and convenience were significantly higher when patients received dabigatran than when they received VKAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) conducted an observational in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=934). Dabigatran vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Treatment satisfaction and patient convenience (PACT-Q2) (p=0.0300). Dabigatran was associated with significantly better patient-perceived treatment convenience and satisfaction compared with vitamin K antagonists at 6 months (P=0.0300 for satisfaction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: