Key result
An apelin to NT-proBNP ratio < 0.82 × 10−2 units was an independent predictor of HFpEF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.18-2.77; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Apelin plays a pivotal role in adverse cardiac remodeling and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but its association with HFpEF in patients with T2DM remained to be investigated.
Does the apelin-to-NT-proBNP ratio predict HFpEF in patients with T2DM?
Observational (n=101)
Does the apelin-to-NT-proBNP ratio predict HFpEF in patients with T2DM?
Odds Ratio: 1.44 (95% CI 1.18–2.77)
p-value: p=0.001
The apelin-to-NT-proBNP ratio may serve as a novel and superior biomarker compared to NT-proBNP alone for identifying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with type 2 diabetes.
May support apelin-to-NT-proBNP ratio for HFpEF prediction in T2DM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Apelin is a regulatory vasoactive peptide, which plays a pivotal role in adverse cardiac remodeling and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether serum levels of apelin is associated with HF with preserved election fraction (HFpEF) in patients with T2DM. Methods: The study retrospectively involved 101 T2DM patients aged 41 to 62 years (48 patients with HFpEF and 28 non-HFpEF patients). The healthy control group consisted of 25 individuals with matched age and sex. Data collection included demographic and anthropometric information, hemodynamic performances and biomarkers of the disease. Transthoracic B-mode echocardiography, Doppler and TDI were performed at baseline. Serum levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and apelin were measured by ELISA in all patients at the study entry. Results: Unadjusted multivariate logistic model yielded the only apelin to NT-proBNP ratio (OR = 1.44; p = 0.001), BMI > 34 кг/м2 (OR = 1.07; p = 0.036), NT-proBNP > 458 pmol/mL (OR = 1.17; p = 0.042), LAVI > 34 mL/m2 (OR = 1.06; p = 0.042) and E/e’ > 11 (OR = 1.04; p = 0.044) remained to be strong predictors for HFpEF. After obesity adjustment, multivariate logistic regression showed that the apelin to NT-proBNP ratio < 0.82 × 10−2 units remained sole independent predictor for HFpEF (OR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.18–2.77; p = 0.001) HFpEF in T2DM patients. In conclusion, we found that apelin to NT-proBNP ratio < 0.82 × 10−2 units better predicted HFpEF in T2DM patients than apelin and NT-proBNP alone. This finding could open new approach for CV risk stratification of T2DM at higher risk of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berezin et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (n=101). Apelin-to-NT-proBNP ratio vs. Apelin and NT-proBNP alone was evaluated on Presence of HFpEF (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18-2.77, p=0.001). An apelin to NT-proBNP ratio < 0.82 × 10−2 units was an independent predictor of HFpEF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.18-2.77; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: