This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Dipstick (reagent strip) and microscopic urine analysis for haematuria was performed prospectively on 1000 consecutive urine samples taken from urological out-patients. Haematuria was present in 185 samples (18.5%) and absent in 687 (68.7%) using both tests; 98 samples (9.8%) had dipstick haematuria that was not confirmed by microscopy and 30 samples (3%) had microscopic haematuria that was missed on dipstick urine analysis. Dipstick urine analysis had a sensitivity of 86.1% and a specificity of 85%. This study confirms that reagent strip testing for haematuria has both false positive and false negative results and indicates that cytoscopy should be considered in all patients with suspected haematuria.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gleeson et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: