Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: In order to improve risk stratification and clinical management of the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has published its eighth edition staging manual. Some major changes have been introduced in the new staging system for both T and N categories. Given the rarity of resectable disease, distal pancreatic cancer is likely underrepresented in the published clinical studies, and how the impact of the staging system actually reflects on to clinical outcomes remain unclear. AIM: edition of TNM staging in distal PDAC. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in seven academic medical centers in the United States. Clinicopathological prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: edition appear to further stratify PFS and OS. For PDAC without an IPMN component, T staging from both versions fails to stratify PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: edition TNM staging system provides even distribution for the T staging, however, it does not provide better risk stratification than previous staging system for distal pancreatic cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saad et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: