Key result
Division III football players had a worse cardiovascular profile than nonathlete controls, including thicker carotid IMT (0.49 vs 0.46 mm) and higher 24-hour systolic BP (124.9 vs 109.8 mmHg).
Why the study?
Does participation in Division III collegiate football increase cardiovascular risk and worsen vascular health compared to nonathlete controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=42)
Does participation in Division III collegiate football increase cardiovascular risk and worsen vascular health compared to nonathlete controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 124.9% vs 109.8%
Division III collegiate American football players exhibit a worse vascular and cardiovascular risk profile, including higher blood pressure and thicker carotid IMT, compared to nonathlete controls.
Division III football players may exhibit worse vascular profiles than controls; leaves open whether targeted screening or interventions are warranted.
Studies report that football players have high blood pressure (BP) and increased cardiovascular risk. There are over 70,000 NCAA football players and 450 Division III schools sponsor football programs, yet limited research exists on vascular health of athletes. This study aimed to compare vascular and cardiovascular health measures between football players and nonathlete controls. Twenty-three athletes and 19 nonathletes participated. Vascular health measures included flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT). Cardiovascular measures included clinic and 24 hr BP levels, body composition, VO2 max, and fasting glucose/cholesterol levels. Compared to controls, football players had a worse vascular and cardiovascular profile. Football players had thicker carotid artery IMT (0.49 ± 0.06 mm versus 0.46 ± 0.07 mm) and larger brachial artery diameter during FMD (4.3 ± 0.5 mm versus 3.7 ± 0.6 mm), but no difference in percent FMD. Systolic BP was significantly higher in football players at all measurements: resting (128.2 ± 6.4 mmHg versus 122.4 ± 6.8 mmHg), submaximal exercise (150.4 ± 18.8 mmHg versus 137.3 ± 9.5 mmHg), maximal exercise (211.3 ± 25.9 mmHg versus 191.4 ± 19.2 mmHg), and 24-hour BP (124.9 ± 6.3 mmHg versus 109.8 ± 3.7 mmHg). Football players also had higher fasting glucose (91.6 ± 6.5 mg/dL versus 86.6 ± 5.8 mg/dL), lower HDL (36.5 ± 11.2 mg/dL versus 47.1 ± 14.8 mg/dL), and higher body fat percentage (29.2 ± 7.9% versus 23.2 ± 7.0%). Division III collegiate football players remain an understudied population and may be at increased cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feairheller et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk (n=42). Collegiate football participation vs. Nonathlete controls was evaluated on 24-hour systolic blood pressure. Division III football players had a worse cardiovascular profile than nonathlete controls, including thicker carotid IMT (0.49 vs 0.46 mm) and higher 24-hour systolic BP (124.9 vs 109.8 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: