BACKGROUND: Mechanisms of recurrence after treatment of in-stent restenosis are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively performed quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in 37 lesions with Palmaz-Schatz stents enrolled in a study of intracoronary radiation for in-stent restenosis. Primary treatment was at the discretion of the operator: PTCA (n=8) or ablation+adjunct PTCA (n=29). Lesions were studied before intervention, immediately after primary intervention, and 42+/-8 minutes later. QCA measurements included minimal luminal diameter and diameter stenosis. Planar IVUS measurements included arterial, stent, lumen, and in-stent tissue areas. Stent, lumen, and in-stent tissue volumes were calculated by use of Simpson's rule. Compared with immediately after intervention, the delayed (42+/-8 minutes) minimal lumen area decreased by 20% (5.8+/-1.9 to 4.5+/-1.3 mm2, P<0.0001) and the lumen volume by 12% (58+/-41 to 52+/-37 mm3, P=0.0001). Ten lesions (27%) had a > or = 2.0-mm2 decrease in minimum lumen area. Lumen loss (1) resulted from increased tissue with the stent, (2) correlated with lesion length and preintervention in-stent tissue, and (3) was not seen angiographically. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant tissue reintrusion shortly after catheter-based treatment of in-stent restenosis. This was greater in longer lesions and those with a larger in-stent tissue burden, was not reflected in the QCA measurements, and may contribute to recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiran et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: