Key result
The Alert for AFib intervention significantly improved knowledge (p=0.005) and attitudes (p<0.001) about treatment-seeking compared with an attention control session.
Why the study?
Does the Alert for AFib intervention improve knowledge and attitudes about treatment-seeking for signs and symptoms of AF in adults ≥65 years old at risk for developing AF?
RCT (n=80)
randomized
Does the Alert for AFib intervention improve knowledge and attitudes about treatment-seeking for signs and symptoms of AF in adults ≥65 years old at risk for developing AF?
The Alert for AFib intervention is feasible and significantly improves knowledge and attitudes regarding treatment-seeking for AF symptoms in older adults at risk.
Improving early detection and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is critical because untreated AF is a major contributor to stroke and heart failure. We sought to generate knowledge about the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of the Alert for AFib intervention on knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about treatment-seeking for signs and symptoms of AF. Adults ≥65 years old (96% White) at risk for developing AF were randomized to receive the Alert for AFib intervention ( n = 40) or an attention control session ( n = 40). Feasibility goals for recruitment, participant retention, adherence, perceived satisfaction and burden, and intervention fidelity were met. From baseline to study completion, knowledge ( p = .005) and attitudes ( p < .001) about treatment-seeking improved more in the intervention group compared with the control group. Results support testing the effectiveness of the Alert for AFib intervention in a large trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCabe et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in At risk for developing atrial fibrillation (n=80). Alert for AFib intervention vs. Attention control session was evaluated on Knowledge about treatment-seeking (p=0.005). The Alert for AFib intervention significantly improved knowledge (p=0.005) and attitudes (p<0.001) about treatment-seeking compared with an attention control session.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: