Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: (1) To measure interstitial fluid pressure under one brand of hosiery in arm lymphoedema. (2) To assess the stability of the swelling over various time scales. Setting: Human microvascular studies laboratory of a teaching hospital. Subjects: Patients with arm oedema following successful breast cancer treatment. Main outcome measures: (1) Arm volume calculations using multiple circumferential measurements by tape measure. (2) Interstitial fluid pressure measurements by wick-in-needle technique in subcutis. Results: The mean swollen arm was 33% greater in volume than the contralateral arm ( n = 50). There was no significant correlation between the size of the arm and the duration of the swelling. There was no significant change in arm volume over 2 weeks ( n = 8) but there was a small (50 ml), significant increase overnight ( p < 0.05). The mean (SD) interstitial fluid pressure while wearing one brand of hosiery (Sigvaris) was 18.7 (5.8) cmH 2 O compared with 1.2 (2.8) cmH 2 O after its removal. There was a significant correlation between the pressure under the sleeve and the pressure without the sleeve ( r = 0.68, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The Sigvaris sleeve exerts sufficient compression to underlying tissue to raise interstitial fluid pressure. This may control arm swelling by reducing fluid filtration rate and/or raising fluid drainage rate from the arm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bates et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: