Paroxetine 20 mg/day for 4 weeks reduced indices of hostility and negative affect and increased social affiliation in normal volunteers compared to placebo.
RCT (n=51)
Double-blind
Does paroxetine alter personality variables and social behavior in normal volunteers?
Paroxetine administration reduces negative affect and increases affiliative behavior in healthy volunteers without depression.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to test the causal hypothesis that serotonergic function modulates aspects of the normal spectrum of individual differences in affective experience and social behavior in humans. METHOD: A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), paroxetine, 20 mg/day (N = 26), or placebo (N = 25) was administered to normal volunteers in a double-blind manner for 4 weeks, and personality variables and social behavior were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 4 of treatment. RESULTS: Relative to placebo, SSRI administration reduced focal indices of hostility through a more general decrease in negative affect, yet did not alter indices of positive affect. In addition, SSRI administration increased a behavioral index of social affiliation. Changes in both negative affect and affiliative behavior were significantly related to volunteers' plasma SSRI levels at the end of the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Central serotonergic function may modulate a dimension of normal personality characterized by reduced negative affective experience and increased affiliative behavior. SSRI administration has significant and detectable effects on these measures even in the absence of baseline clinical depression or other psychopathology.
Knutson et al. (1998) conducted an RCT in Normal volunteers (n=51). Paroxetine vs. Placebo was evaluated on Personality variables and social behavior (indices of hostility, negative affect, positive affect, and social affiliation). Paroxetine 20 mg/day for 4 weeks reduced indices of hostility and negative affect and increased social affiliation in normal volunteers compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: