Key result
Gross and microscopic examinations of a case of congenital idiopathic hypertrophy of the heart showed no obvious mechanism explanatory of the condition.
Case Report (n=1)
This case report details the clinical and necropsy findings of an infant with congenital idiopathic hypertrophy of the heart, highlighting the lack of an obvious explanatory mechanism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single case reveals no mechanism for congenital idiopathic cardiac hypertrophy; leaves open etiology and should not change practice.
It seems unlikely that the hidden defects in germ plasm or embryonic environment that are responsible for congenital abnormalities in infants will soon be discovered, although it is possible that the primitive tissues involved in any particular anomaly may be determined. Although there are several theories to explain the changes accounting for the condition known as congenital idiopathic hypertrophy of the heart, none seems satisfactory. In the case here described, gross and microscopic examinations of the heart showed no obvious mechanism explanatory of the condition. No investigation was made of the capillary bed, congenital narrowing of which has been suggested by Emerson as a possible cause of the abnormality. The case is reported because of the clinical observations leading to the antemortem diagnosis, the proof by necropsy, and the contribution to the study of heart disease made by the family history. Moreover, reports of the anomaly proved by autopsy have
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howard B. Sprague (1931) conducted a case report in Congenital idiopathic hypertrophy of the heart (n=1). Gross and microscopic examinations of a case of congenital idiopathic hypertrophy of the heart showed no obvious mechanism explanatory of the condition.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: