Key result
Molecular testing of soft tissue tumors has diagnostic value, and specific chromosomal abnormalities may impact treatment response and prognosis in various sarcoma subtypes.
Molecular biology and markers play an increasingly important role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of soft tissue sarcomas.
During the last 10 years, molecular testing of soft tissue tumors has become increasingly important, not only in the diagnostic approach to these lesions, but also regarding their prognosis and pathogenesis. A subset of soft tissue sarcomas bear chromosomal abnormalities including reciprocal translocations, deletions, mutations, and amplifications, which turned out to be histotype specific. Beside their diagnostic value in sarcoma typing and subtyping (always in an appropriate clinical and histologic context), some of these abnormalities (eg, KIT and platelet derived growth factor, alpha chain mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors) may also impact on treatment response and prognosis. This review will focus on the potential impact of molecular biology and markers on the prognosis and management of patients with Ewing sarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, myxoid, and well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma, sarcoma with myogenic differentiation, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louis Guillou (2008) conducted a review in Soft tissue sarcoma. Molecular biology and markers was evaluated. Molecular testing of soft tissue tumors has diagnostic value, and specific chromosomal abnormalities may impact treatment response and prognosis in various sarcoma subtypes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: