Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study was designed to investigate which muscarinic receptors the indoline derivatives interact with and also their pharmacological properties. Compounds I and II contracted guinea-pig ileum in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas compounds III-IX behaved as antagonists and Schild plots gave straight lines. 4-DAMP antagonized the contractile responses to compounds I and II, and the pA2 values for 4-DAMP were 8.96 +/- 0.23 and 9.09 +/- 0.06, respectively. In guinea-pig left atrium, compound I partly inhibited twitch responses, whereas compound II did not have any effect. In rabbit vas deferens, compounds I and II produced inhibitory effects on twitch responses evoked by field stimulation. Pirenzepine antagonized the inhibitory responses of compounds I and II, and the pA2 values for pirenzepine were 7.90 +/- 0.13 and 8.12 +/- 0.06, respectively. Compound I has about 150-fold higher affinity to M1 receptors than to M3 receptors, while compound II has about 360-fold higher affinity to M1 receptors. Our results indicate that compounds I and II show 7- and 16-fold higher M1 receptor selectivity than McN-A-343, respectively. Therefore, compound II is selective for M1 receptors over M2 or M3 receptors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adachi et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: