Key result
Preoperative nutritional support did not significantly reduce overall septic complications (30% vs 35.3%, p=NS), but significantly reduced sepsis in malnourished patients (21% vs 53.3%, p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does preoperative nutritional support reduce septic complications in patients undergoing major surgery for gastrointestinal disease?
RCT (n=100)
randomized
No
Does preoperative nutritional support reduce septic complications in patients undergoing major surgery for gastrointestinal disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 30% vs 35.3%
p-value: p=NS
Preoperative parenteral nutrition significantly reduces septic complications in malnourished patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery, though it does not significantly affect overall mortality.
Supports selective preoperative nutrition in malnourished GI surgery patients; extends RCT evidence for targeted benefit despite neutral overall results.
In order to assess the significance of malnutrition in determining surgical complications and the possibility of their reduction by preoperative nutritional support (PNS), a randomized controlled trial is being performed at our institution. The results relative to 100 patients who underwent major surgery for gastrointestinal disease, are presented here. In the treatment group 49 patients received 30 kcal/kg/day and 200 mg/kg/day of nitrogen for at least 7 days in the immediate preoperative period (nine patients were excluded from this group due to early surgery—seven cases; or refusal to accept PNS—two cases. Data analysis with their inclusion or exclusion showed similar results.) Fifty‐one patients constituted the control group. The observed septic complication rate was, respectively, 30 and 35.3% (p:NS). When the analysis was restricted to the patients with abnormal instant nutritional assessment (INA), as defined by Seltzer et al (serum albumin <3.5 g/dl and/or total lymphocyte count <1500 cells/mm3), a statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of sepsis between the two subgroups (21% vs 53.3%, p < 0.05). Analogous results were obtained from the patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 16.7% of septic complications in the malnourished treated patients and 100% in the malnourished control ones (p < 0.05). The occurrence of serious sepsis (sepsis score ≥ 10, according to the scoring system developed by Elebute and Stoner) in the malnourished subgroups was 5.2% and 26.7%, respectively, (p = 0.09). The postoperative mortality rate was not significantly changed by the PNS (reduction from 3.9% to 2.5%, p:NS). This result was expected since power analysis indicates a too large number of patients would be needed to show a statistically significant difference in this low mortality risk category of patients. Our study suggests that malnourished patients waiting for major gastrointestinal surgery may benefit from an adequate PNS that seems to significantly reduce septic complication rate. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 12: 195–197, 1988)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellantone et al. (1988) conducted an RCT in major surgery for gastrointestinal disease (n=100). Preoperative nutritional support (PNS) vs. Control was evaluated on septic complication rate (p=NS). Preoperative nutritional support did not significantly reduce overall septic complications (30% vs 35.3%, p=NS), but significantly reduced sepsis in malnourished patients (21% vs 53.3%, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: