Key result
Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation achieved high acute procedural success (≥94.7% across all regions) globally, with a 3.6% rate of serious procedure-related adverse events.
Why the study?
Although cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation is widely adopted, regional variations in standards of care have not been well characterized.
What are the regional variations in patient selection, procedural characteristics, and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=3,680)
Yes
What are the regional variations in patient selection, procedural characteristics, and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation demonstrates high acute success and low complication rates globally, despite regional variations in patient selection and procedural characteristics.
Real-world data support cryoballoon ablation safety across regions; leaves open optimal patient selection and procedural standardization in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation is a well-established anatomical approach for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although widely adopted, regional variations in standards of care have not been well characterized. METHODS: Patients with AF were enrolled in the Cryo Global Registry (NCT02752737) from May 2016 to Sept 2021 at 128 sites in 37 countries and treated with cryoballoon ablation according to local clinical practice. Baseline patient and procedural characteristics were summarized for 8 regions (Central Asia & Russia, East Asia, Europe, Middle East, North America, South Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia). Serious procedure-related adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated in a subset of patients with ≥ 7 days of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 3,680 patients undergoing initial PVI for AF were included. Cryoballoon ablation was commonly performed in patients with paroxysmal AF. Mean age ranged from 47 ± 12 years in the Middle East to 64 ± 11 years in East Asia. Mean procedure time was ≤ 95 min in all regions. Average freeze duration ranged from 153 ± 41 s in Southeast Asia to 230 ± 29 s in Central Asia & Russia. Acute procedural success was ≥ 94.7% in all geographies. In 3,126 subjects with ≥ 7 days of follow-up, 122 procedure-related SAEs were reported in 111 patients (3.6%) and remained low in all regions. One procedure-related death was reported during data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Despite regional variations in patient selection and procedural characteristics, PVI using cryoballoon ablation was performed with high acute success and short procedural times around the world. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02752737.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scazzuso et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=3,680). Cryoballoon ablation was evaluated on Acute procedural success for pulmonary vein isolation (attempted electrical isolation of all major PVs or their anomalous equivalents). Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation achieved high acute procedural success (≥94.7% across all regions) globally, with a 3.6% rate of serious procedure-related adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: