Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heat-shock regulation was detected for three out of the five members of the groESL multigene family in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. The results uncovered the simultaneous presence of two distinct heat-shock control systems which so far have not been reported to co-exist in a single prokaryotic organism. The first system concerns groESL1 whose transcription is controlled in a sigma32-dependent manner similar to that known from work done with Escherichia coli. Heat-shock control of groESL4 is mediated by the second system, which is characterized by an inverted-repeat DNA structure originally described as a heat-shock regulatory element (CIRCE) in Bacillus subtilis. This element represses expression of groESL4 under non-stress conditions, as inferred from the increased expression of a groESL4'-'lacZ fusion suffering a 4 bp deletion within the CIRCE element. The two control systems clearly differ with respect to the temperature dependence and the kinetics of the heat-shock response, and they also respond differently to the stress signal elicited by incorporation of the amino acid analogue p-F-phenylalanine into cellular protein. Knock-out mutations in groEL4 resulted in an increased expression of groESL4, suggesting that repression via CIRCE depends, itself, upon the cellular level of GroEL4 protein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babst et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: