Key result
Aortic-valve stenosis has a prevalence of up to 2.5% among persons younger than 75 years and up to 8% in those 75 years or older.
Why the study?
Does early valve replacement improve outcomes compared to watchful waiting in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic-valve stenosis?
Does early valve replacement improve outcomes compared to watchful waiting in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic-valve stenosis?
This editorial discusses the clinical dilemma of whether to intervene early or wait in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic-valve stenosis.
Aortic-valve stenosis is an increasingly common clinical condition in the aging population. Population studies indicate a prevalence of up to 2.5% even among persons younger than 75 years of age, with a prevalence of up to 8% in those 75 years of age or older, with large geographic differences between low-income and high-income countries. 1-3 Severe aortic-valve stenosis is associated with increased mortality, and valve replacement has emerged as the only effective treatment. Consequently, treatment of aortic-valve stenosis has become one of the most common surgical or interventional procedures in the past several years. The severity of aortic-valve stenosis is typically . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefan Blankenberg (2025) conducted an editorial in Aortic-valve stenosis. Aortic-valve stenosis has a prevalence of up to 2.5% among persons younger than 75 years and up to 8% in those 75 years or older.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: