This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Material and Methods: Forty extracted human upper premolars were endodontically treated and divided into four groups based on the bulk-fill resin composite used: CO: Scothbond Multi-Purpose + Fütek Z3S0XT; SF: Scothbond Universal + Fütek Bulk Fill; SO: OptiBond All-in-one + SonicFill; and, TT: Tetric N- Bond Universal + Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill. Universal adhesive systems were applied using the self-etching technique. After 24 hours, specimens underwent compressive loading at lmm/min, and fracture patterns were evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test (p>O.OS), while fracture patterns were assessed with the chi-square test (p O.OS), with favorable fractures observed in the CO and SF groups. Conclusion: The fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk-fill resin composites does not differ from those restored with conventional nanohybrid resin composites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girotto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: