Why the study?
Do invasive devices manipulated by nursing increase the risk of hemorrhagic events in patients receiving continuous infusion of sodium heparin?
Cohort (n=79)
No
Do invasive devices manipulated by nursing increase the risk of hemorrhagic events in patients receiving continuous infusion of sodium heparin?
In patients receiving continuous sodium heparin, the presence of invasive devices such as nasoenteral and bladder catheters significantly increases the risk of localized hemorrhagic events.
Device-associated bleeding in heparin patients warrants nursing vigilance; leaves open causal confirmation and prevention strategies.
Objective: to verify the occurrence of hemorrhagic events related to invasive devices manipulated by nursing in anticoagulated patients. Methods: retrospective cohort study, with analysis of medical records. A total of 867 medical records were investigated, from which a sample of 79 patients who received continuous infusion of sodium heparin was selected. The types of hemorrhagic events and the different invasive devices were submitted to non-parametric statistical treatments and to the association tests. Results: the most common types of hemorrhagic events occurred in the skin (47.4%); puncture site (15.8%); airways (15.8%); genitourinary system (15.8%) and gastrointestinal system (10.5%). Patients with nasoenteral catheters had a 15.8-foldhigher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p=0.032). Conclusion: the rate of bleeding events (21.5%) was high, and more frequent in the skin. Patients with nasoenteral catheters have a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and patients with indwelling bladder catheters have a seven-fold increased risk of hematuria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camerini et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Anticoagulated patients requiring intensive or semi-intensive care (n=79). Nasoenteral catheter vs. No nasoenteral catheter was evaluated on Gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 15.8, 95% CI 0.85-11.03, p=0.032).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: