Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The measurement of trace breath gases is of growing interest for its potential to provide non-invasive physiological information in health and disease. While instrumental techniques such as selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) can achieve this, these are less suitable for clinical application. Sensitive sensor-based systems for breath ammonia could be more widely deployed, but have proven challenging to develop. This work demonstrates the sequential analytical validation of an electrochemical impedance-based sensor system for the measurement of ammonia in breath using SIFT-MS. Qualitative and relative responses between the two methods were comparable, although there were consistent differences in absolute concentration. When tested in artificial breath ammonia, sensors had a relative impedance sensitivity of 3.43 × 10−5 ppbv−1 for each breath in the range of 249–1653 ppbv (r 2 = 0.87, p< 0.05). When correlated with SIFT-MS using human breath (n = 14), ammonia was detected in the range of 100–700 ppbv (r = 0.78, p < 0.001), demonstrating acceptable sensitivity, reproducibility and dynamic range for clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: