Key result
Ticagrelor significantly increased the risk of any BARC bleeding (45.6% vs. 23.6%; OR 2.71) and dyspnea (26.3% vs. 13.6%; OR 2.25) at 1 month compared to clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
Clinical evidence raises concerns regarding high risks of adverse events and serious bleeding with standard-dose ticagrelor in East Asian patients, prompting evaluation of adverse events and premature DAPT discontinuation.
Does ticagrelor 90 mg compared to clopidogrel 75 mg increase adverse events and premature DAPT discontinuation in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=944)
Yes
Does ticagrelor 90 mg compared to clopidogrel 75 mg increase adverse events and premature DAPT discontinuation in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 2.71 (95% CI 2.01–3.65)
Absolute Event Rate: 45.6% vs 23.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
In East Asian patients with ACS, standard-dose ticagrelor is associated with significantly higher rates of early bleeding and dyspnea compared to clopidogrel, leading to a nearly 9-fold increased risk of premature DAPT discontinuation.
Ticagrelor was associated with higher bleeding-related early DAPT discontinuation in East Asians; leaves open optimal dosing strategies for randomized confirmation.
Background Clinical evidence raises the issues regarding the high risk of adverse events and serious bleeding in East Asian patients receiving standard-dose ticagrelor treatment. We sought to evaluate the association between adverse events and their associations with premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods We enrolled East Asian patients presented with acute coronary syndrome who took DAPT with 90-mg ticagrelor (n = 270) or 75-mg clopidogrel (n = 674). During 1-month treatment, antiplatelet effect was evaluated with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and the occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea was assessed with the dedicated questionnaire. Results During 1-month follow-up, patients on ticagrelor showed the higher risks of bleeding (any BARC type: 45.6% vs. 23.6%; odds ratio [OR], 2.71 and BARC 1 or 2 type: 45.2% vs. 22.1%; OR, 2.90, respectively) and dyspnea (26.3% vs. 13.6%; OR, 2.25) compared with those on clopidogrel. In a receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis to predict bleeding risk, ticagrelor showed a lower cutoff of low platelet reactivity (LPR) (P2Y12 reaction unit [PRU] ≤ 20) than clopidogrel (PRU ≤ 110). Early occurrence of bleeding episode was significantly associated with LPR phenotype (OR, 2.68), not type of P2Y12 inhibitor. In multivariate analysis, type of P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel: OR, 2.19) and bleeding episode (OR, 2.94) were independent predictors for dyspnea occurrence. During 1-year follow-up, DAPT with ticagrelor showed a higher risk of premature discontinuation compared to DAPT with clopidogrel (27.8% vs. 4.7%; adjusted HR, 8.84), which risk appeared frequent during the first month (14.4%) during DAPT with ticagrelor. Early occurrence of bleeding and dyspnea synergistically increased a risk of DAPT non-adherence, irrespective of type of P2Y12 inhibitor. Conclusion This analysis is the first evidence to show the different cutoff of low platelet reactivity during the reversible (ticagrelor) versus irreversible P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel). Early occurrence of bleeding and dyspnea is very common during standard-dose ticagrelor treatment in East Asian patients, which show a close association with premature DAPT discontinuation. Clinical trial registration [ https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ], identifier[NCT046 50529].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=944). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily was evaluated on Incidence of any Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding at 1 month (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.01-3.65, p=<0.001). Ticagrelor significantly increased the risk of any BARC bleeding (45.6% vs. 23.6%; OR 2.71) and dyspnea (26.3% vs. 13.6%; OR 2.25) at 1 month compared to clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: